The importance of headlines in SEO

There was an interesting feature in today’s Media Guardian about the potential death of the punning headline in the world of tabloid journalism, with the rise of SEO (Search engine optimisation for the non-techies out there).

Basically, headlines such as ‘Gotcha!’ for the sinking of the Belgrano back in 1982 just won’t cut the mustard in the cut-and-thrust of search engines, because, even though the following article will talk about the news event, the headline has no relation to facts.

As someone who works online and also has spent many a year writing shocking puns to go with copy (‘Monet for old rope’ springs to mind on one art-related feature), I find myself torn between the two.

For example, I probably should have called this entry something like “Pun for the money, two for the SEO”, but that wouldn’t have generated any Google traffic at all.

To be honest, the death of puns is a bit of a shame. I totally understand why getting your website high up on Google is important, but given that the Web is about words a lot of the time, it seems farcical that SEO actually constrains, rather than liberates an online journalist.

Places like the Sun and the Mirror will be hardest hit with the pun ban and it will be interesting to see how they respond to the challenges of SEO and whether they change headlines on articles, once they hit the web.

My personal pun headline goes way back to when I worked on the student newspaper in Sheffield. A colleague had written a review of the latest Star Trek movie, which he had thoroughly enjoyed and came up with the following gem: ‘Rapt in Klingon Film’!

Google + Simon Fuller = Nightmare

© BBC - Simon FullerYesterday’s online Guardian reported that Google is apparently in talks with entertainment supremo Simon Fuller to change the way TV is watched on the internet.

Yes, the man behind American Idol and the Spice Girls could be about to inflict further misery on the world by teaming up with the most powerful online brand.

Although nothing has been officially revealed, it’s thought that their deal would aim to revolutionise the way entertainment and music are distributed.

OK, so they might well produce something quite amazing that will help everyone involved in the music industry.

But isn’t it more likely that it will just give some of the muppets who appear on shows like X-Factor more exposure, while leaving the genuine gigging musicians, who plough their lonely non-pop, non-mainstream furrow, desperately looking for outlets for their wares.

The memory of the one-off World Idol that was shown on ITV about 5 years ago still makes me shudder even now. God help us, if this is what the Google/Fuller deal will produce.

The wonders of Garlik!

GarlicNo, it isn’t a typo. I’m actually extolling the virtues of a relatively new start-up, called Garlik.

It’s basically an online version of Experian or Equifax, in that it does a report on you and where data about you is available online. Oh, and it runs a credit check, too.

It’s been set up by people behind egg.com and firstdirect, so it has a pretty good pedigree. I’ve been using it now for a good few months and have been mightily impressed.

You give it a few basic details about yourself and then it sweeps the world wide web and reports back on where you might be featuring online, giving a risk assessment of how much is out there about you.

Sounds fairly simple, I grant you, but for those of out there who use the internet a lot, it’s quite scary to see how much you’re visible online.

Fortunately, many of the Rob Mansfields in the world aren’t always me online and my online moniker which I use to sign up with doesn’t give much away.

Which leads me onto something else I did recently online. We’ve all Googled ourselves (come on, you know you have), but I did a Google image search the other day to check if my face was anywhere.

Thank goodness it’s not. My avatar is out there, but genuine photographic representations are almost non-existent. Something I’m very happy about!